Filed: Dec. 24, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7562 BRIAN ELLIS VALBERT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH; GAYLAN SANDERS, Mr.; HAROLD ALEXANDER, Mr.; PEGGY WADMAN, Dr., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (9:12-cv-01973-RBH) Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013 Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7562 BRIAN ELLIS VALBERT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH; GAYLAN SANDERS, Mr.; HAROLD ALEXANDER, Mr.; PEGGY WADMAN, Dr., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (9:12-cv-01973-RBH) Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013 Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit J..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7562
BRIAN ELLIS VALBERT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH; GAYLAN SANDERS,
Mr.; HAROLD ALEXANDER, Mr.; PEGGY WADMAN, Dr.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(9:12-cv-01973-RBH)
Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian Ellis Valbert, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr.,
Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Brian Ellis Valbert appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Valbert v. South Carolina Dep’t of Mental Health, No.
9:12-cv-01973-RBH (D.S.C. Aug. 20, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2