Filed: Nov. 21, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1628 In Re: EDDIE GAMBLE, SR., Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:11-ct-03176-FL) Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: November 21, 2013 Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie Gamble, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Eddie Gamble, Sr., filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1628 In Re: EDDIE GAMBLE, SR., Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:11-ct-03176-FL) Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: November 21, 2013 Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie Gamble, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Eddie Gamble, Sr., filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and a..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1628
In Re: EDDIE GAMBLE, SR.,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(5:11-ct-03176-FL)
Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: November 21, 2013
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Gamble, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eddie Gamble, Sr., filed a petition for a writ of
mandamus and a supplemental petition for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on
his Bivens * action. He seeks an order from this court directing
the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s
docket reveals that the district court has dismissed the action
without prejudice and denied Gamble’s motions for
reconsideration. Accordingly, because Gamble has obtained the
relief he requested, we deny the mandamus petition and
supplemental mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
*
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971).
2