Filed: Nov. 21, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1780 EDWARD G. SHLIKAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SLM CORPORATION (Sallie Mae); UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:09-cv-02806-WDQ) Submitted: November 19, 2013 Decided: November 21, 2013 Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Aff
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1780 EDWARD G. SHLIKAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SLM CORPORATION (Sallie Mae); UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:09-cv-02806-WDQ) Submitted: November 19, 2013 Decided: November 21, 2013 Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affi..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1780 EDWARD G. SHLIKAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SLM CORPORATION (Sallie Mae); UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:09-cv-02806-WDQ) Submitted: November 19, 2013 Decided: November 21, 2013 Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward G. Shlikas, Appellant Pro Se. Rand Lewis Gelber, LAW OFFICES OF RAND L. GELBER, Rockville, Maryland; Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Edward G. Shlikas appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shlikas v. SLM Corp, No. 1:09-cv-02806-WDQ (D. Md. Aug. 25, 2010; May 25, 2011; May 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
