Filed: Mar. 28, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2403 ARNOLD BENSON CLARKE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. E.I. DUPONT DeNEMOURS & CO. INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00711-JAG) Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: March 28, 2013 Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. * Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arnold Benson Clarke, Appell
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2403 ARNOLD BENSON CLARKE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. E.I. DUPONT DeNEMOURS & CO. INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00711-JAG) Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: March 28, 2013 Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. * Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arnold Benson Clarke, Appella..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2403 ARNOLD BENSON CLARKE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. E.I. DUPONT DeNEMOURS & CO. INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00711-JAG) Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: March 28, 2013 Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. * Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arnold Benson Clarke, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. * This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). PER CURIAM: Arnold Benson Clarke appeals the district court’s orders denying his complaint and amended complaint alleging claims of breach of contract, patent infringement, fraud, conspiracy, and racial discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clarke v. E.I. Dupont DeNemours, No. 3:12-cv-00711-JAG (E.D. Va. Oct. 22 & Nov. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
