U.S. v. HARDY, 12-7698. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130207135
Visitors: 21
Filed: Feb. 07, 2013
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2013
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Albert Eugene Hardy, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hardy, No. 1:07-cr-00010-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mater
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Albert Eugene Hardy, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hardy, No. 1:07-cr-00010-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materi..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Albert Eugene Hardy, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hardy, No. 1:07-cr-00010-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
