U.S. v. McDOWNEY, 13-6015. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130430155
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tyrone McDowney appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFF
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tyrone McDowney appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFI..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone McDowney appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
