McFADDEN v. GAINEY, 13-6208. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130430175
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Joseph Lee McFadden appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McFadden v. Gainey, No. 4:12-cv-01470-MGL (D.S.C. Feb. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the f
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Joseph Lee McFadden appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McFadden v. Gainey, No. 4:12-cv-01470-MGL (D.S.C. Feb. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the fa..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Lee McFadden appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McFadden v. Gainey, No. 4:12-cv-01470-MGL (D.S.C. Feb. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
