BOWIE v. HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, 12-2448 (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130528108
Visitors: 1
Filed: May 28, 2013
Latest Update: May 28, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Edward Bowie appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bowie v. Henderson Police Dep't, No. 5:12-cv-00514-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2012 & Jan. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Edward Bowie appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bowie v. Henderson Police Dep't, No. 5:12-cv-00514-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2012 & Jan. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Edward Bowie appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bowie v. Henderson Police Dep't, No. 5:12-cv-00514-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2012 & Jan. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
