ANDERSON v. PRUITT, 13-6570. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130618112
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jerome Anderson appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny reconsideration of the court's earlier order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jerome Anderson appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny reconsideration of the court's earlier order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jerome Anderson appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny reconsideration of the court's earlier order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Pruitt, No. 1:10-cv-00553-NCT-JEP (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
