WALLACE v. TROST, 13-1454. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130625138
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Andrew Scott Wallace appeals the district court's order denying his motion to remand under 28 U.S.C. 1447(c) (2006) and granting defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wallace v. Trost , No. 8:13-cv-00101-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument becaus
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Andrew Scott Wallace appeals the district court's order denying his motion to remand under 28 U.S.C. 1447(c) (2006) and granting defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wallace v. Trost , No. 8:13-cv-00101-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Andrew Scott Wallace appeals the district court's order denying his motion to remand under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (2006) and granting defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wallace v. Trost, No. 8:13-cv-00101-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
