U.S. v. PURDY, 13-6614. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130730121
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bradley Eric Purdy seeks to appeal the district court's order construing his notice of appeal as a motion for reconsideration and denying it. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545-46 (1949). The order
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bradley Eric Purdy seeks to appeal the district court's order construing his notice of appeal as a motion for reconsideration and denying it. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545-46 (1949). The order P..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bradley Eric Purdy seeks to appeal the district court's order construing his notice of appeal as a motion for reconsideration and denying it. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Purdy seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
