WILLIAMS v. BECK, 13-6731 (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130905141
Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Stanley Lorenzo Williams challenges the district court's order denying his letter/motion dated February 20, 2013. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Stanley Lorenzo Williams challenges the district court's order denying his letter/motion dated February 20, 2013. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Stanley Lorenzo Williams challenges the district court's order denying his letter/motion dated February 20, 2013. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
