CORRIGAN v. ATKINS, 13-7183. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20131122104
Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Nov. 22, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mark R. Corrigan appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) motion for reconsideration of the court's 2002 order granting Appellees' motion for summary judgment and dismissing Corrigan's 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Corrigan v. Atkins , No. 5:98-c
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mark R. Corrigan appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) motion for reconsideration of the court's 2002 order granting Appellees' motion for summary judgment and dismissing Corrigan's 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Corrigan v. Atkins , No. 5:98-ct..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark R. Corrigan appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) motion for reconsideration of the court's 2002 order granting Appellees' motion for summary judgment and dismissing Corrigan's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Corrigan v. Atkins, No. 5:98-ct-00667-BR (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
