U.S. v. CARR, 13-7425. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20131224055
Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 24, 2013
Latest Update: Dec. 24, 2013
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Steven Donewan Carr appeals the district court's order deny his motions for the return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Carr, No. 5:98-cr-00246-RLV-2 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Steven Donewan Carr appeals the district court's order deny his motions for the return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Carr, No. 5:98-cr-00246-RLV-2 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before ..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Steven Donewan Carr appeals the district court's order deny his motions for the return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Carr, No. 5:98-cr-00246-RLV-2 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
