WILLIAMS v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICE, 13-7546. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20131224065
Visitors: 25
Filed: Dec. 24, 2013
Latest Update: Dec. 24, 2013
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Robert Williams appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williams' motions for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Corizon Med. Serv., No. 8:12-cv-02121-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Robert Williams appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williams' motions for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Corizon Med. Serv., No. 8:12-cv-02121-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and ..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Robert Williams appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williams' motions for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Corizon Med. Serv., No. 8:12-cv-02121-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
