Filed: Feb. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1930 MABINTY MARRAY DEEN, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: January 29, 2014 Decided: February 7, 2014 Before MOTZ, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marc Seguinót, SEGUINÓT & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Att
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1930 MABINTY MARRAY DEEN, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: January 29, 2014 Decided: February 7, 2014 Before MOTZ, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marc Seguinót, SEGUINÓT & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Atto..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1930
MABINTY MARRAY DEEN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: January 29, 2014 Decided: February 7, 2014
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marc Seguinót, SEGUINÓT & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia,
for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General,
Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Susan Bennett Green,
Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mabinty Marray Deen, a native and citizen of Sierra
Leone, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the
immigration judge’s order finding that she was not eligible for
adjustment of status. Deen claims that she was denied due
process because the Attorney General misinformed the immigration
judge. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that
Deen fails to show that the outcome of the case was prejudiced
in any way by the Attorney General’s representation. See
Anim v. Mukasey,
535 F.3d 243, 256 (4th Cir. 2008).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2