Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Isidoro Rodriguez v. Commissioner, IRS, 13-1966 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-1966 Visitors: 259
Filed: Jan. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1966 ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ; IRENE RODRIGUEZ, Petitioners - Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 10691-09) Submitted: January 21, 2014 Decided: January 23, 2014 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Isidoro Rodriguez, Irene Rodriguez, Appellants Pro Se. Robert William Metzler, T
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1966 ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ; IRENE RODRIGUEZ, Petitioners - Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 10691-09) Submitted: January 21, 2014 Decided: January 23, 2014 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Isidoro Rodriguez, Irene Rodriguez, Appellants Pro Se. Robert William Metzler, Teresa Thomas Milton, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Isidoro Rodriguez and Irene Rodriguez appeal the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s assessment of additional taxes and penalty with respect to their 2006 federal income tax liability. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Rodriguez v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue Serv., Tax Ct. No. 10691-09 (U.S. Tax Ct. Feb. 13, 2013). We deny the Rodriguez’ motion to recuse the judges of this court as well as their motion to vacate the judgment below. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer