Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Favio Vasquez-Perez v. Eric Holder, Jr., 13-2068 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-2068 Visitors: 16
Filed: May 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2068 FAVIO SECUNDINO VASQUEZ-PEREZ, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: May 20, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jaime Jasso, LAW OFFICES OF JAIME JASSO, Westlake Village, California, for Pet
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2068 FAVIO SECUNDINO VASQUEZ-PEREZ, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: May 20, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jaime Jasso, LAW OFFICES OF JAIME JASSO, Westlake Village, California, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Jennifer P. Levings, Julia J. Tyler, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Favio Secundino Vasquez-Perez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision denying his motion for a continuance and pretermitting his application for cancellation of removal. We have reviewed the administrative record and Vasquez-Perez’s contentions on appeal and conclude that his contentions are without merit. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Vasquez-Perez, (B.I.A. Aug. 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer