Filed: Mar. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2084 VINCENT JOHN HALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DURON BURNEY, Officer; TOWN OF MAXTON; TAMMY DEESE; GLADYS DEAN, Defendants – Appellees, and MAXTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:10-cv-00184-BO) Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 26, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, C
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2084 VINCENT JOHN HALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DURON BURNEY, Officer; TOWN OF MAXTON; TAMMY DEESE; GLADYS DEAN, Defendants – Appellees, and MAXTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:10-cv-00184-BO) Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 26, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Ci..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2084
VINCENT JOHN HALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DURON BURNEY, Officer; TOWN OF MAXTON; TAMMY DEESE; GLADYS
DEAN,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
MAXTON POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (7:10-cv-00184-BO)
Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 26, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincent John Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Ronnie Monroe Mitchell,
MITCHELL LAW GROUP, Fayetteville, North Carolina, Andrew James
Santaniello, CLAWSON & STAUBES, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Vincent John Hall appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Hall’s motion for appointment of counsel
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall
v. Burney, No. 7:10-cv-00184-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3