Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jeffrey Tobol v. Carolyn Colvin, 13-2213 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-2213 Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2213 JEFFREY J. TOBOL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-00171-GCM-DCK) Submitted: March 31, 2014 Decided: April 10, 2014 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opin
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2213 JEFFREY J. TOBOL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-00171-GCM-DCK) Submitted: March 31, 2014 Decided: April 10, 2014 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charlotte W. Hall, CHARLES T. HALL LAW FIRM, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Paul B. Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Anne M. Tompkins, United States Attorney, Jeanne D. Semivan, Special Asssitant United States Attorney, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jeffrey J. Tobol appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the Commissioner’s decision denying Tobol’s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tobol v. Colvin, No. 1:12-cv-00171-GCM- DCK (W.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer