Filed: Jan. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2301 KIMBERLY ANN SHREVE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KRISTEN LYNN FETTER; COLON WILLOUGHBY, JR.; TINA HOAGLAND BYRD; WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:13-cv-00354-H) Submitted: January 21, 2014 Decided: January 23, 2014 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2301 KIMBERLY ANN SHREVE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KRISTEN LYNN FETTER; COLON WILLOUGHBY, JR.; TINA HOAGLAND BYRD; WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:13-cv-00354-H) Submitted: January 21, 2014 Decided: January 23, 2014 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit J..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2301
KIMBERLY ANN SHREVE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KRISTEN LYNN FETTER; COLON WILLOUGHBY, JR.; TINA HOAGLAND
BYRD; WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:13-cv-00354-H)
Submitted: January 21, 2014 Decided: January 23, 2014
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kimberly Ann Shreve, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kimberly Ann Shreve appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Shreve v. Fetter, No. 5:13-cv-00354-H
(E.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2