Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Chong Su Yi v. Fox Valley Motors, 13-2315 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-2315 Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2315 CHONG SU YI, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FOX VALLEY MOTORS; LOTUS OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, of Maryland; SECRETARY OF STATE, Department of Motor Vehicles of Illinois; NATIONAL DRIVER REGISTRY, NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration); STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2315 CHONG SU YI, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FOX VALLEY MOTORS; LOTUS OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, of Maryland; SECRETARY OF STATE, Department of Motor Vehicles of Illinois; NATIONAL DRIVER REGISTRY, NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration); STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13-cv-01064-PWG) Submitted: March 27, 2014 Decided: March 31, 2014 Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chong Su Yi, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Chong Su Yi appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Yi v. Fox Valley Motors, No. 8:13-cv-01064-PWG (D. Md. Aug. 20, 2013). We deny Yi’s motion to amend the caption. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer