Filed: Mar. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2354 TRACY MARGO COOK, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JOE KEFFER, Warden, FMC Carswell, Carswell Federal Medical Center; HERNAN REYES, M D, Clinical Director, Carswell Federal Medical Center; ARLY SURPRIS; J. LANCASTER, DO, Carswell Federal Medical Center; LINDA ROBINSON, Registered Nurse, Clinical Nurse, Carswell Federal Medical Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Distric
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2354 TRACY MARGO COOK, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JOE KEFFER, Warden, FMC Carswell, Carswell Federal Medical Center; HERNAN REYES, M D, Clinical Director, Carswell Federal Medical Center; ARLY SURPRIS; J. LANCASTER, DO, Carswell Federal Medical Center; LINDA ROBINSON, Registered Nurse, Clinical Nurse, Carswell Federal Medical Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2354
TRACY MARGO COOK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JOE KEFFER, Warden, FMC Carswell, Carswell Federal Medical
Center; HERNAN REYES, M D, Clinical Director, Carswell
Federal Medical Center; ARLY SURPRIS; J. LANCASTER, DO,
Carswell Federal Medical Center; LINDA ROBINSON, Registered
Nurse, Clinical Nurse, Carswell Federal Medical Center,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:13-cv-00128-REP)
Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 4, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tracy Margo Cook, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tracy Margo Cook appeals the district court’s order
denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Although the district
court denied the motion on the merits, the court did not have
jurisdiction because the case had been transferred to and
docketed in another federal court. See TechnoSteel, LLC v.
Beers Constr. Co.,
271 F.3d 151, 157 (4th Cir. 2001).
Accordingly, we affirm the denial of relief on that basis. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2