Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Alice Bryant v. Carolyn Colvin, 13-2364 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-2364 Visitors: 48
Filed: Jun. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2364 ALICE M. BRYANT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (1:13-cv-00012-MOC) Submitted: May 28, 2014 Decided: June 18, 2014 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2364 ALICE M. BRYANT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (1:13-cv-00012-MOC) Submitted: May 28, 2014 Decided: June 18, 2014 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charlotte W. Hall, CHARLES T. HALL LAW FIRM, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Paul B. Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Anne M. Tompkins, United States Attorney, Hugh Dun Rappaport, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alice Bryant appeals the district court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s denial of Bryant’s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryant v. Colvin, No. 1:13-cv-00012-MOC (W.D.N.C. Oct. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer