Filed: Feb. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2369 STEPHEN G. STERNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK; BRYAN ABRAHAM, Woodforest National Bank Representative; LISA COTTON, Woodforest National Bank Ex. Vice President, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00229-MR-DLH) Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2369 STEPHEN G. STERNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK; BRYAN ABRAHAM, Woodforest National Bank Representative; LISA COTTON, Woodforest National Bank Ex. Vice President, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00229-MR-DLH) Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25,..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2369
STEPHEN G. STERNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK; BRYAN ABRAHAM, Woodforest National
Bank Representative; LISA COTTON, Woodforest National Bank
Ex. Vice President,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00229-MR-DLH)
Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen G. Sterner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Stephen G. Sterner appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint against
Defendants after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) review. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s judgment. Sterner v. Woodforest
Nat’l Bank, No. 1:13-cv-00229-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 2013).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2