Filed: Feb. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2398 JEROME J. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HOFFMAN COMPANY, LLC; PRESIDENT LAUREN K. DOUGLAS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01364-LMB-TRJ) Submitted: February 5, 2014 Decided: February 20, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2398 JEROME J. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HOFFMAN COMPANY, LLC; PRESIDENT LAUREN K. DOUGLAS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01364-LMB-TRJ) Submitted: February 5, 2014 Decided: February 20, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2398 JEROME J. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HOFFMAN COMPANY, LLC; PRESIDENT LAUREN K. DOUGLAS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01364-LMB-TRJ) Submitted: February 5, 2014 Decided: February 20, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jerome J. Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Hoffman Co., No. 1:13-cv- 01364-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 7, 2013; entered Nov. 15, 2013). We grant Brown leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
