Filed: Jan. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7120 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KELBY DEVONTA BENJAMIN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (1:00-cr-00200-JAB-1) Submitted: December 12, 2013 Decided: January 10, 2014 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kelby Devonta Be
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7120 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KELBY DEVONTA BENJAMIN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (1:00-cr-00200-JAB-1) Submitted: December 12, 2013 Decided: January 10, 2014 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kelby Devonta Ben..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7120
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KELBY DEVONTA BENJAMIN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (1:00-cr-00200-JAB-1)
Submitted: December 12, 2013 Decided: January 10, 2014
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kelby Devonta Benjamin, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Brodish Binkley,
Sandra Jane Hairston, Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett
Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kelby Devonta Benjamin appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for
reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Benjamin, No. 1:00-cr-
00200-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. July 2, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2