Filed: Jan. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7492 ROGER LEE DEAL, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; NURSE STEVENS; SERGEANT TRIPLETT; INMATE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00364-RJC) Submitted: January 21, 2014 Decided: January 24, 2014 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. A
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7492 ROGER LEE DEAL, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; NURSE STEVENS; SERGEANT TRIPLETT; INMATE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00364-RJC) Submitted: January 21, 2014 Decided: January 24, 2014 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Af..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7492
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; NURSE STEVENS;
SERGEANT TRIPLETT; INMATE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00364-RJC)
Submitted: January 21, 2014 Decided: January 24, 2014
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roger Lee Deal, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly D. Grande,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Roger Lee Deal, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Deal v. NC Dep’t of Corrs., No. 3:12-cv-00364-RJC
(W.D.N.C. Sept. 6, 2013). We deny Deal’s motion to appoint a
mediator, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2