Filed: Jan. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Dismissed by Supreme Court, October 6, 2014 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7572 CHAUNCEY A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. E. DAY, Food Service Manager, N.C.C., Defendant – Appellee, and G. K. WASHINGTON, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-01129-TSE-TRJ) Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014 Before WILKINSON and
Summary: Dismissed by Supreme Court, October 6, 2014 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7572 CHAUNCEY A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. E. DAY, Food Service Manager, N.C.C., Defendant – Appellee, and G. K. WASHINGTON, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-01129-TSE-TRJ) Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014 Before WILKINSON and D..
More
Dismissed by Supreme Court, October 6, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7572
CHAUNCEY A. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
E. DAY, Food Service Manager, N.C.C.,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
G. K. WASHINGTON,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:12-cv-01129-TSE-TRJ)
Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chauncey A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chauncey A. Williams appeals the district court’s
orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Williams v. Day, No. 1:12-cv-01129-TSE-TRJ (E.D. Va.
Nov. 26, 2012 & filed Aug. 14, 2013, entered Aug. 15, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2