Filed: May 01, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7688 BRUCE W. KOENIG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner; GARY MAYNARD, Secretary; BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; DOCTOR BAUCOM, Medical Director; DOCTOR JOUBERT, Regional Medical Director; COLIN OTTEY, M.D.; GREG FLURRY, P.A.; ANSEL SHIRCLIFFE, Manager; LIEUTENANT HARBAUGH; SERGEANT BOWMAN; OLIVE RYAN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Bal
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7688 BRUCE W. KOENIG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner; GARY MAYNARD, Secretary; BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; DOCTOR BAUCOM, Medical Director; DOCTOR JOUBERT, Regional Medical Director; COLIN OTTEY, M.D.; GREG FLURRY, P.A.; ANSEL SHIRCLIFFE, Manager; LIEUTENANT HARBAUGH; SERGEANT BOWMAN; OLIVE RYAN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Balt..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7688
BRUCE W. KOENIG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner; GARY MAYNARD, Secretary;
BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; DOCTOR BAUCOM, Medical Director;
DOCTOR JOUBERT, Regional Medical Director; COLIN OTTEY,
M.D.; GREG FLURRY, P.A.; ANSEL SHIRCLIFFE, Manager;
LIEUTENANT HARBAUGH; SERGEANT BOWMAN; OLIVE RYAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:12-cv-00690-JFM)
Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: May 1, 2014
Before WYNN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce W. Koenig, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber,
Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; H. Kenneth
Armstrong, ARMSTRONG, DONAHUE, CEPPOS & VAUGHAN, CHTD,
Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bruce W. Koenig appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and
denying his motion for relief from judgment, Fed. R. Civ. P. 59.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Koenig v. Stouffer, No. 1:12-cv-00690-JFM,
2013 WL
625337 (D. Md. Feb. 19, 2013); Koenig v. Stouffer, No. 1:12-cv-
00690-JFM (D. Md. filed Oct. 16, 2013; entered Oct. 17, 2013).
We deny Appellees’ motion to strike Koenig’s pro se supplemental
informal brief, and deny Koenig’s motion for preparation of a
transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2