Filed: Mar. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1068 In Re: WILKINS MCNAIR, JR., Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:06-cr-00281-CCB-1; 1:09-cr-00320-CCB-1) Submitted: March 6, 2014 Decided: March 12, 2014 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilkins McNair, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Wilkins McNair, Jr., petitions for a writ
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1068 In Re: WILKINS MCNAIR, JR., Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:06-cr-00281-CCB-1; 1:09-cr-00320-CCB-1) Submitted: March 6, 2014 Decided: March 12, 2014 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilkins McNair, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Wilkins McNair, Jr., petitions for a writ o..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1068
In Re: WILKINS MCNAIR, JR.,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:06-cr-00281-CCB-1; 1:09-cr-00320-CCB-1)
Submitted: March 6, 2014 Decided: March 12, 2014
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wilkins McNair, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Wilkins McNair, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his
motions filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012), and his
motion for release on bond. He seeks an order from this court
directing the district court to act. Our review of the district
court’s docket reveals that the district court denied relief on
McNair’s § 2255 motions in orders entered on February 18, 2014.
Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided
McNair’s cases, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and grant McNair’s motion to
amend and supplement his petition. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2