Filed: May 28, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1194 WILLIAM REID BLACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE UNITED STATES ARMY; ARMY REVIEW BOARD AGENCY; CAPTAIN PULSON, Captain of Batter A 15FD; THOMAS WHITE, Secretary of Army (U.S.); JOHN M. MCHUGH, U.S. Army Special Affairs; RICK A. SCHWEIGERT, Chief Congressional Special Action Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1194 WILLIAM REID BLACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE UNITED STATES ARMY; ARMY REVIEW BOARD AGENCY; CAPTAIN PULSON, Captain of Batter A 15FD; THOMAS WHITE, Secretary of Army (U.S.); JOHN M. MCHUGH, U.S. Army Special Affairs; RICK A. SCHWEIGERT, Chief Congressional Special Action Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1194
WILLIAM REID BLACK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE UNITED STATES ARMY; ARMY REVIEW BOARD AGENCY; CAPTAIN
PULSON, Captain of Batter A 15FD; THOMAS WHITE, Secretary of
Army (U.S.); JOHN M. MCHUGH, U.S. Army Special Affairs; RICK
A. SCHWEIGERT, Chief Congressional Special Action Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00889-NCT-LPA)
Submitted: May 22, 2014 Decided: May 28, 2014
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Reid Black, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Reid Black appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), Black’s
complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Black
v. U.S. Army, No. 1:13-cv-00889-NCT-LPA (M.D.N.C. Jan. 23,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2