Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Stacy Wade, 14-1232 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-1232 Visitors: 39
Filed: Jun. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1232 THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, and EDITH REDDEN; LARRY REDDEN, Defendants – Appellees, v. STACY EDWARD WADE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00037-JFA) Submitted: June 19, 2014 Decided: June 23, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1232 THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, and EDITH REDDEN; LARRY REDDEN, Defendants – Appellees, v. STACY EDWARD WADE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00037-JFA) Submitted: June 19, 2014 Decided: June 23, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stacy Edward Wade, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Daniel LaFave, Regina Hollins Lewis, GAFFNEY, LEWIS & EDWARDS, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina; William E. Hopkins, Jr., HOPKINS LAW FIRM, LLC, Pawleys Island, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Stacy Edward Wade appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Relief from the District Court’s Order” granting The Prudential Insurance Company of America’s motion for default judgment, motion for deposit, and motion for summary judgment, and granting Defendants Edith and Larry Redden’s motion for summary judgment, and he has filed a motion for a copy of the record at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Wade’s motion for a copy of the record at government expense and affirm the district court’s order. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Wade, No. 3:12-cv-00037-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer