Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Karen Clark v. Virginia Community College System, 14-1262 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-1262 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1262 KAREN CLARK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM; THOMAS NELSON COMMUNITY COLLEGE; ALVIN SCHEXNIDER, President; BEVERLY WALKER- GRIFFEA, Vice President Student Affairs; LISA JOHNSON, Director Human Resources; BETSY HARRISON, Dean of Student Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1262 KAREN CLARK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM; THOMAS NELSON COMMUNITY COLLEGE; ALVIN SCHEXNIDER, President; BEVERLY WALKER- GRIFFEA, Vice President Student Affairs; LISA JOHNSON, Director Human Resources; BETSY HARRISON, Dean of Student Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (4:12-cv-00172-MSD-LRL) Submitted: July 29, 2014 Decided: July 31, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karen Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Clayton Fleming, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Karen Clark appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Clark’s motion to compel the production of documents and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clark v. Va. Cmty. Coll. Sys., No. 4:12-cv-00172-MSD-LRL (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer