Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bryan Atwood v. CertainTeed Corporation, 14-1407 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-1407 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1407 BRYAN L. ATWOOD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Virginia, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-01006-CMH-JFA) Submitted: November 7, 2014 Decided: December 9, 2014 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1407 BRYAN L. ATWOOD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Virginia, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-01006-CMH-JFA) Submitted: November 7, 2014 Decided: December 9, 2014 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederick D. Greco, GRECO & GRECO, P.C., McLean, Virginia, for Appellant. M. Kelly Tillery, Sean P. McConnell, PEPPER & HAMILTON, LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Matthew D. Foster, PEPPER & HAMILTON, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Brian L. Atwood appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of CertainTeed Corporation and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) in his civil action claiming that CertainTeed violated the Virginia Uniform Trade Secrets Act and breached the parties’ nondisclosure agreement. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Atwood v. CertainTeed Corp., No. 1:13- cv-01006-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 5, 2014, entered Mar. 6, 2014; Apr. 4, 2014). Atwood’s motion to supplement the record is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer