Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jerome Brown v. Motorola Mobility Inc., 14-1487 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-1487 Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 08, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1487 JEROME JULIUS BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01514-GBL-IDD) Submitted: October 1, 2014 Decided: October 8, 2014 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome Julius
More
                               UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                               No. 14-1487


JEROME JULIUS BROWN,

                Plaintiff - Appellant,

          v.

MOTOROLA MOBILITY INCORPORATED,

                Defendant - Appellee.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-01514-GBL-IDD)


Submitted:   October 1, 2014                 Decided:   October 8, 2014


Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Jerome Julius Brown, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

           Jerome Julius Brown appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

(2012).      We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.    See Brown v. Motorola Mobility Inc., No. 1:13-

cv-01514-GBL-IDD (E.D. Va. Feb. 11, 2014).                   We dispense with

oral   argument   because      the    facts   and   legal     contentions    are

adequately    presented   in    the    materials    before    this   court   and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

                                                                      AFFIRMED




                                        2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer