In Re: Iris Allen v., 14-1537 (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: 14-1537
Visitors: 62
Filed: Sep. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1537 In re: IRIS F. ALLEN, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:13-cv-25022) Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 2, 2014 Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Iris F. Allen, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Iris F. Allen petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the dist
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1537 In re: IRIS F. ALLEN, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:13-cv-25022) Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 2, 2014 Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Iris F. Allen, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Iris F. Allen petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the distr..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1537
In re: IRIS F. ALLEN,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:13-cv-25022)
Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 2, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Iris F. Allen, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Iris F. Allen petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on
her 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 (2012) petition. She seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act. We find the
present record does not reveal undue delay in the district
court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Source: CourtListener
