Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cristobal Coreas v. Eric Holder, Jr., 14-1623 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-1623 Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1623 CRISTOBAL ANTONIO COREAS, a/k/a Juan Antonio Mejias, a/k/a Jose Mejia, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: September 24, 2014 Decided: October 2, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cristobal Antonio Coreas, Petitioner Pro Se. Stuart F. Del
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1623 CRISTOBAL ANTONIO COREAS, a/k/a Juan Antonio Mejias, a/k/a Jose Mejia, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: September 24, 2014 Decided: October 2, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cristobal Antonio Coreas, Petitioner Pro Se. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Jesse David Lorenz, Emily Anne Radford, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cristobal Antonio Coreas, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Coreas (B.I.A. May 28, 2014). We also deny Coreas’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer