Filed: Oct. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1673 MIKE WILLOUGHBY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HENRICO COUNTY; OWEN I. ASHMAN; LEE A. HARRIS, JR.; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; HENRICO COUNTY COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY OFFICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:14-cv-00223-HEH) Submitted: October 16, 2014 Decided: October 20, 2014 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THAC
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1673 MIKE WILLOUGHBY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HENRICO COUNTY; OWEN I. ASHMAN; LEE A. HARRIS, JR.; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; HENRICO COUNTY COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY OFFICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:14-cv-00223-HEH) Submitted: October 16, 2014 Decided: October 20, 2014 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACK..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1673
MIKE WILLOUGHBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HENRICO COUNTY; OWEN I. ASHMAN; LEE A. HARRIS, JR.;
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; HENRICO COUNTY COMMONWEALTH'S
ATTORNEY OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:14-cv-00223-HEH)
Submitted: October 16, 2014 Decided: October 20, 2014
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mike Willoughby, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Ramsey Newby, OFFICE
OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Henrico, Virginia; Sherry A. Fox,
THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia; Erin Rose McNeill,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mike Willoughby appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (2012),
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and state negligence law. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Willoughby v. Henrico Cnty., No. 3:14-cv-00223-HEH (E.D. Va.
June 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2