Filed: Oct. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1674 ERICKA MOSBY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY UPCARE CENTER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:14-cv-00266-AWA-DEM) Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ericka Mosby, Appellant
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1674 ERICKA MOSBY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY UPCARE CENTER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:14-cv-00266-AWA-DEM) Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ericka Mosby, Appellant ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1674
ERICKA MOSBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOCIAL SECURITY UPCARE CENTER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (2:14-cv-00266-AWA-DEM)
Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ericka Mosby, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ericka Mosby appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil complaint against the Social Security
UpCare Center for failure to state a claim after conducting a
review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. See Mosby v. Social
Security UpCare Ctr., No. 2:14-cv-00266-AWA-DEM (E.D. Va. June
23, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2