Filed: Dec. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1694 MONIFA A. GETHERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHERIFF DONNIE HARRISON; WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF SURETY, Defendants – Appellees, and WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00430-F) Submitted: December 15, 2014 Decided: December 18, 2014 Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1694 MONIFA A. GETHERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHERIFF DONNIE HARRISON; WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF SURETY, Defendants – Appellees, and WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00430-F) Submitted: December 15, 2014 Decided: December 18, 2014 Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1694
MONIFA A. GETHERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHERIFF DONNIE HARRISON; WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF SURETY,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:12-cv-00430-F)
Submitted: December 15, 2014 Decided: December 18, 2014
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony James Cuticchia, Jr., AJC LEGAL SERVICES, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Roger A. Askew, Jennifer M. Jones,
WAKE COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Monifa A. Gethers appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Appellees in her civil action under
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
§ 2000e-2(a)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Gethers v. Harrison, No. 5:12-cv-00430-F
(E.D.N.C. June 12, 2014) We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3