Filed: Dec. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1903 BERYL MING YU YOU, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. JAMES H. TOLLEY; NURSE SUSAN ZAYAC; MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:13-cv-01683-DCN) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublish
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1903 BERYL MING YU YOU, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. JAMES H. TOLLEY; NURSE SUSAN ZAYAC; MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:13-cv-01683-DCN) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublishe..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1903 BERYL MING YU YOU, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. JAMES H. TOLLEY; NURSE SUSAN ZAYAC; MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:13-cv-01683-DCN) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Beryl Ming Yu You, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Lynwood Brown, Russell Grainger Hines, YOUNG CLEMENT RIVERS, LLP, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Beryl Ming Yu You appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. You v. Tolley, No. 2:13- cv-01683-DCN (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
