Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Pamela Bond v. US Dep't of Education, 14-1908 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-1908 Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1908 PAMELA SUE BOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:14-cv-00013-JLK-RSB) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pamela S
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1908 PAMELA SUE BOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:14-cv-00013-JLK-RSB) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pamela Sue Bond, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Pamela Sue Bond appeals the district court’s order dismissing the civil action she brought against the United States Department of Education. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Bond leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s order. See Bond v. U.S. Dep’t of Educ., No. 4:14-cv-00013-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 18, 2014). We deny Bond’s motions for the preparation of a transcript at Government expense and for an update as to the status of her student loan. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer