Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jerry Brown v. Eric Wilson, 14-6181 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-6181 Visitors: 44
Filed: Jul. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6181 JERRY BROWN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. ERIC D. WILSON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01304-LO-TCB) Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 28, 2014 Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Brown, Appellant Pr
More
                              UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                              No. 14-6181


JERRY BROWN,

                  Petitioner - Appellant,

          v.

ERIC D. WILSON,

                  Respondent - Appellee.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.   Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-01304-LO-TCB)


Submitted:   July 24, 2014                      Decided: July 28, 2014


Before FLOYD and      THACKER,   Circuit   Judges,   and   DAVIS,   Senior
Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Jerry Brown, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            Jerry Brown, a federal prisoner,                  appeals the district

court’s    order    denying     relief    on    his    28   U.S.C.    § 2241    (2012)

petition.        We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.     Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis,    we    affirm     for   the   reasons      stated    by    the   district

court.     Brown v. Wilson, No. 1:13-cv-01304-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Dec.

11, 2013).       We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal    contentions      are   adequately       presented      in    the    materials

before    this    court   and   argument       would    not   aid    the    decisional

process.



                                                                              AFFIRMED




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer