Filed: Jul. 14, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6264 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DORSEY DOMANTA DUDLEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:07-cr-00142-D-1) Submitted: July 1, 2014 Decided: July 14, 2014 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dorsey Domanta Du
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6264 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DORSEY DOMANTA DUDLEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:07-cr-00142-D-1) Submitted: July 1, 2014 Decided: July 14, 2014 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dorsey Domanta Dud..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6264
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DORSEY DOMANTA DUDLEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
Chief District Judge. (5:07-cr-00142-D-1)
Submitted: July 1, 2014 Decided: July 14, 2014
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dorsey Domanta Dudley, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-
Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dorsey Domanta Dudley appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Dudley, No. 5:07-cr-00142-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2014). We deny
Dudley’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2