Filed: Jul. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6307 MONTE DECARLOS WINSTON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00172-REP) Submitted: July 29, 2014 Decided: July 31, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Monte Decarlos Wins
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6307 MONTE DECARLOS WINSTON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00172-REP) Submitted: July 29, 2014 Decided: July 31, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Monte Decarlos Winst..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6307
MONTE DECARLOS WINSTON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:12-cv-00172-REP)
Submitted: July 29, 2014 Decided: July 31, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monte Decarlos Winston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Monte Decarlos Winston, a federal prisoner, appeals
the district court’s order denying his motion for immediate
release, which was filed after the district court dismissed
Winston’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although
we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Winston v. U.S.
Attorney Gen., No. 3:12-cv-00172-REP (E.D. Va. Jan. 27, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2