Filed: Jul. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6370 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DONIKKI HARDY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:01-cr-00235-HMH-1) Submitted: July 18, 2014 Decided: July 24, 2014 Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6370 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DONIKKI HARDY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:01-cr-00235-HMH-1) Submitted: July 18, 2014 Decided: July 24, 2014 Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6370 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DONIKKI HARDY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:01-cr-00235-HMH-1) Submitted: July 18, 2014 Decided: July 24, 2014 Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donikki Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Carrie Fisher Sherard, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Donikki Hardy appeals the district court’s orders granting the Government’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion for sentence reduction and denying Hardy’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hardy, No. 7:01-cr-00235-HMH-1 (D.S.C. Feb. 25 & Mar. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
