Filed: Jun. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6423 JAMES STROUSE, Petitioner – Appellant, v. E. D. WILSON, Warden; BERNARDO, SIS; LAGRONE, SIS; BLACKBURN, Counselor; BENNETT, DHO; HOLDERFIELD, SIS, Respondents – Appellees, and BUREAU OF PRISONS; KEVIN KIDDY, Unit Manager; MENDEZ, SIS; GENTRY, SIS, Respondents. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00653-REP) Submi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6423 JAMES STROUSE, Petitioner – Appellant, v. E. D. WILSON, Warden; BERNARDO, SIS; LAGRONE, SIS; BLACKBURN, Counselor; BENNETT, DHO; HOLDERFIELD, SIS, Respondents – Appellees, and BUREAU OF PRISONS; KEVIN KIDDY, Unit Manager; MENDEZ, SIS; GENTRY, SIS, Respondents. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00653-REP) Submit..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6423
JAMES STROUSE,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
E. D. WILSON, Warden; BERNARDO, SIS; LAGRONE, SIS;
BLACKBURN, Counselor; BENNETT, DHO; HOLDERFIELD, SIS,
Respondents – Appellees,
and
BUREAU OF PRISONS; KEVIN KIDDY, Unit Manager; MENDEZ, SIS;
GENTRY, SIS,
Respondents.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:12-cv-00653-REP)
Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 3, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Strouse, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United
States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Strouse, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Strouse v. Wilson, No. 3:12-cv-00653-REP
(E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2