Filed: Jul. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6478 LENNELL DYCHES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KAREN MARTIN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-02838-SB) Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 28, 2014 Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lennell Dyches, Appellan
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6478 LENNELL DYCHES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KAREN MARTIN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-02838-SB) Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 28, 2014 Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lennell Dyches, Appellant..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6478
LENNELL DYCHES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KAREN MARTIN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (1:12-cv-02838-SB)
Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 28, 2014
Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lennell Dyches, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lennell Dyches appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant the
Defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for
summary judgment, on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v.
Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S.
388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
Dyches v. Martin, No. 1:12-cv-02838-SB (D.S.C. March 17, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2