Filed: Sep. 08, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6523 OSCAR ROBLES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LT. STURDINVANT, Inmate Support; CAPT. WEDERBAUM, Work Release Director; MR. WHITLEY, Jail Director (Superintendent), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:14-cv-00070-JLK-RSB) Submitted: August 27, 2014 Decided: September 8, 2014 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and K
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6523 OSCAR ROBLES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LT. STURDINVANT, Inmate Support; CAPT. WEDERBAUM, Work Release Director; MR. WHITLEY, Jail Director (Superintendent), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:14-cv-00070-JLK-RSB) Submitted: August 27, 2014 Decided: September 8, 2014 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KE..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6523
OSCAR ROBLES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LT. STURDINVANT, Inmate Support; CAPT. WEDERBAUM, Work
Release Director; MR. WHITLEY, Jail Director
(Superintendent),
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:14-cv-00070-JLK-RSB)
Submitted: August 27, 2014 Decided: September 8, 2014
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oscar Robles, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Oscar Robles appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Robles’s motions for
preparation of transcript at government expense and for
appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment.
Robles v. Sturdinvant, No. 7:14-cv-00070-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar.
27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2